TTHE RESOURCE PARADIGM OF FASHION // Part 2, takes a methodical, practical, creative and experimental approach to the development of product solutions, production methods, processes, systems and consumption patterns. It is developed on the basis of the future scenarios, concept and design brief from THE RESOURCE PARADIGM OF FASHION // Part 1.

Individual design processes in experiments in 2D and 3D will be carried out, tested and further developed based on a user-oriented approach. In addition, focus is on professional communication of ideas, concepts and solutions as well the reasoning behind the choices. Focus will also be on the student's leaning process and accompanied documentation throughout the module.

In this module, the student acquires knowledge, skills and competencies that enable them to implement sustainable design processes and work experimentally and commercially with product solutions, production methods, processes and systems and communication with the user.

As part of the module, the student hands in and presents the defined assignments. At the same time, the student prepares a sewing.

•concept development
•aesthetics and design theory
•materials
•semiotics
•presentation
•argumentation strategy

The graduate can:
•reflect on and argue in favour of relevant theories and methods
•implement a design process based on an experimental and commercial approach
•assess, select and argue in favour of material selection in relation to design - develop innovative, competitive design concepts
•communicate product and concept-related topics on a global scale
•use visual communication to support a product/concept
•analyse and evaluate the current industry and market conditions and organise the design development accordingly

The graduate can:
•manage development-oriented assignments in design and innovation
•take responsibility for and independently carry out a design and product development process
•analyse and reflect on design and target a concept, company or organisation
•handle trend and culture analyses when arguing for opt-ins and opt-outs during the design process